In the event that teenage youngsters of migrants was in fact inquired about the kind from family relations (parents) it believe they had, 70 % told you flexible which have authority, 20 percent said authoritarian, and nine % said permissive. Such investigation resemble those taken from those whose mothers are not migrants. Truly the only striking truth is you to definitely 16 % of your latter respect their loved ones since authoritarian, that could imply the need of your mother which stays during the home to insist the woman expert, which often leads the lady to exercise greater control over brand new students.
In order to prove a possible relationship or dependence of this aspect on certain sociodemographic characteristics (age and sex) of the participants, the chi square test was administered, which showed that teenagers’ opinion of their family type depends on gender (? 2 = , gl = 2, p < .05). Thus 77.5 percent of females report that their families are flexible, whereas only 67.5 percent of males have this opinion. No statistically significant differences were detected regarding age (? 2 = , gl = 10, p > .05).
A total of 45.4 percent of teenage children of migrants regard the relationships in their families as fair to poor. As shown in table 4, the data reveal a difference of 12.6 percent percentage points of those compared with those whose parents are non-migrants (32.8 %). In this respect the chi square test shows a significant difference (? 2 = , gl = 2, p < .05).
05), since forty-eight.six percent from migrants’ adolescent youngsters explained it fair to help you terrible, while simply 37.9 percent ones whoever moms and dads have not emigrated express this examine (discover table 4). To date, one should consider the absence of either-or both dad and mom owed that he has got moved in addition to their impact on the way they get in touch with both.
Teens just who experience the lack of one otherwise both of the moms and dads due to migration, reported that domestic legislation are clear, both constantly (forty-two %) or sometimes (44 %), and simply the new eight percent reported too little clear family unit members legislation. This answers are comparable to those people advertised of the teenagers whoever moms and dads haven’t emigrated.
Teens were asked in order to rates the latest the total amount that they imagine you to specific household members functions was found in their families, yielding the second performance. Regarding your form from the satisfaction out of subsistence means and actual well-being, very people, who were migrants’ people, asserted that it was achieved, in contrast as to what is reported because of the college students from non-migrants.
Concerning the fresh new campaign of securities out-of love and you may social partnership, by which the definition of from thoughts are coached, kids thought that this was reached inside their group, due to the fact revealed from the desk 5.
As a whole can see, having migrants’ adolescent college students, how they esteem their families is actually individually attached to the advice he has of its parents’ relationships
This type of data show that the majority of both the students out of migrants and you can non-migrants considered, oftentimes, your purpose of the expression out of passion throughout the friends where they real time was met to a good the amount, in keeping with the new results from experts in the field (Macias, -145).
Regarding their opinion about their parents’ couple relationship, there was also a significant difference (? 2 = , gl = 2, p <
As for the instruction linked to different socialization, migrants’ people, most just who was teenagers, believed that this was achieved to some extent or slightly a lot, with people that believed that this is reached in order to a beneficial great extent. At the same time, but not, 14.seven percent of them evaluated so it form are badly did even though 5.dos % proclaimed that it was perhaps not hit anyway. In the example of people with low-migrant mothers, the best fee is located in the categories of some a parcel and a lot (look for table 6).